Do You Agree to Redevelop a City Free Essays

Do you agree to redevelop Lee Tong Street ? I do not agree to redevelop Lee Tong Street because of the following reasons . From the economic point of view , redevelop Lee Tong Street cause serious economic losses to the shop owners and the residents . First , after the redevelopment , the property prices will be increased . We will write a custom essay sample on Do You Agree to Redevelop a City or any similar topic only for you Order Now It will threaten the survival of the existing small shop owners . They concern about whether they will receive enough compensation to cover their losses . Some may not be able to afford the high rent and will be forced to close down . Second , the residents worry if they will receive enough compensation to purchase a flat of a similar size and whether their living conditions will be improved . Also , the tenants concern about whether they could be relocated in the same area and afford the increased rent in the future . Those stakeholders need to face a serious economic losses in the redevelopment of Lee Tung Street . From the social point of view , redevelopment of Lee Tung Street will bring a radical change for the local residents . First , after the redevelopment , Lee Tung Street will have many high-rise buildings . Because of the densely-packed high-rise buildings , the density will be increased . And the air pollution also will become more serious . Second , Lee Tung Street was originally a public space where residents could hang around and interact with each other freely . Communities could then be established . However , after these streets are redeveloped into shopping malls which belong to developers and are privately owned , people will no longer be entitled to the right to interact freely in these private areas . This hinders the formation of communities . The redevelopment bring many inconvenient to the society and the residents . P. 1 From the cultural point of view , redevelop Lee Tung Street will destroy the local cultural , Chinese traditional crafts and the traditional architectural . First , residents along Lee Tung Street made use of the buildings to establish a local printing industry . They used the front part of the building as their shops , while the back was used as the printing workshops . A cluster of wedding card printing shops soon sprang up and turned Lee Tung Street into a well-known print merchandising hub which is part of the collective memory of Hong Kong people . The local cultural will gradually vanish along with the redevelopment . Different traditional shops and food stalls will be replaced with monotonous chain stores and shops , undermining cultural diversity . Next , although the old buildings on Lee Tung Street are not of special historical value , very few of those buildings in the architectural style of the 50s and 60s are left . Destroy a cultural is easy , but establish a cultural is not a easy job . Redevelopment Lee Tung Street will destroy Hong Kong local cultural . Some people might assert that after the redevelopment of Lee Tung Street , it can has a better use of land for others sustainable development . And the better facilities can solve the poor hygiene and the pollution problems . However , after the redevelopment , the buildings will changed from mainly six-storey Chinese-styled tenement buildings to high-rise buildings . The residents will more and more . Then , the density of Lee Tung Street will much increased . Also , the redevelopment project include building new shopping malls . That means Lee Tung Street will become a tourist spot like Causeway Bay . As we all know , Causeway Bay ‘s air pollution problem is the most serious in Hong Kong . Are we going to forgo our environmental problem? Redevelop Lee Tung Street not only affect the local residents , but also all the Hong Kong people . The losses for redevelopment project are more than the benefits . Therefore , it is a wrong decision to redevelop Lee Tung Street . ( End ) How to cite Do You Agree to Redevelop a City, Papers

Jospeh Andrews as Comic Epic in Prose free essay sample

Joseph Andrews From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia This article is about the novel. For the former Liberal Member of Parliament, see Joseph Andrews (politician). Joseph Andrews Author(s)Henry Fielding Original titleThe History of the Adventures of Joseph Andrews and His Friend, Mr. Abraham Adams CountryBritain LanguageEnglish Publication date1742 Media typeprint Preceded byShamela, or An Apology for the Life of Mrs. Shamela Andrews(1741) Followed byThe Life and Death of Johnathan Wild, the Great (1743) Joseph Andrews, or The History of the Adventures of Joseph Andrews and of his Friend Mr. Abraham Adams, was the first published full-length novel of the English author and magistrate Henry Fielding, and indeed among the first novels in the English language. Published in 1742 and defined by Fielding as a ‘comic epic poem in prose’, it is the story of a good-natured footmans adventures on the road home from London with his friend and mentor, the absent-minded parson Abraham Adams. We will write a custom essay sample on Jospeh Andrews as Comic Epic in Prose or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page The novel represents the coming together of the two competing aesthetics of eighteenth-century literature: the mock-heroic and neoclassical (and, by extension, aristocratic) approach ofAugustans such as Alexander Pope and Jonathan Swift; and the popular, domestic prose fiction of novelists such as Daniel Defoe and Samuel Richardson. The novel draws on a variety of inspirations. Written in imitation of the manner of Cervantes, the author of Don Quixote (see title page on right), the work owes much of its humour to the techniques developed by Cervantes, and its subject-matter to the seemingly loose arrangement of events,digressions and lower-class characters to the genre of writing known as picaresque. In deference to the literary tastes and recurring tropes of the period, it relies on bawdy humour, an impendingmarriage and a mystery surrounding unknown parentage, but conversely is rich in philosophicaldigressions, classical erudition and social purpose. Contents [hide] 1 Background †¢2 Plot summary o2. 1 Book I o2. 2 Book II o2. 3 Book III o2. 4 Book IV †¢3 Stage Adaptation †¢4 Film adaptation †¢5 References †¢6 External links [edit]Background Fielding’s first venture into prose fiction came a year previously with the publication in pamphlet form of Shamela, a travesty of, and direct response to, the stylistic failings and mor al hypocrisy that Fielding saw in Richardson’s Pamela. Richardson’s epistolary tale of a resolute servant girl, armed only with her ‘virtue’, battling against her master’s attempts at seduction had become an overnight literary sensation in 1741. The implicit moral message – that a girl’s chastity has eventual value as a commodity – as well as the awkwardness of the epistolary form in dealing with ongoing events, and the triviality of the detail which the form necessitates, were some of the main targets of Fielding’s parody. Richardson would continue to be a target of Fielding’s first novel, but the Pamela phenomenon was just one example of what he saw as a culture of literary abuses in the mid-18th century. Colley Cibber, poet laureate and mock-hero of Pope’s Dunciad, is identified in the first chapter of the novel as another offender against propriety, morality and literary value. The impetus for the novel, as Fielding claims in the preface, is the establishment of a genre of writing which I do not remember to have been hitherto attempted in our language, defined as the comic epic-poem in prose: a work of prose fiction, epic in length and variety of incident and character, in the hypothetical spirit of Homer’s lost (and possibly apocryphal) comic poem Margites. He dissociates his fiction from the scandal-memoir and the contemporary novel. Book III describes the work as biography. As becomes apparent from the first few chapters of the novel in which Richardson and Cibber are parodied mercilessly, the real germ ofJoseph Andrews is Fielding’s objection to the moral and technical limitations of the popular literature of his day. But while Shamela started and finished as a sustained subversion of a rival work, in Joseph Andrews Fielding merely uses the perceived depravation of popular literature as a springboard to conceive more fully his own philosophy of prose fiction. [edit]Plot summary [edit]Book I The novel begins with the affable, intrusive narrator outlining the nature of our hero. Joseph Andrews is the brother of Richardson’s Pamela and is of the same rustic parentage and patchy ancestry. At the age of ten years he found himself tending to animals as an apprentice to Sir Thomas Booby. It was in proving his worth as a horseman that he first caught the eye of Sir Thomas’s wife, Lady Booby, who employed him (now seventeen) as her footman. After the death of Sir Thomas, Joseph finds that his Lady’s affections have redoubled as she offers herself to him in her chamber while on a trip to London. In a scene analogous to many of Pamela’s refusals of Mr B in Richardson’s novel, however, Lady Booby finds that Joseph’sChristian commitment to chastity before marriage is unwavering. After suffering the Lady’s fury, Joseph dispatches a letter to his sister very much typical of Pamela’s anguished missives in her own novel. The Lady calls him once again to her chamber and makes one last withering attempt at seduction before dismissing him from both his job and his lodgings. With Joseph setting out from London by moonlight, the narrator introduces the reader to the heroine of the novel, Fanny Goodwill. A poor illiterate girl of ‘extraordinary beauty’ (I, xi) now living with a farmer close to Lady Booby’s parish, she and Joseph had grown ever closer since their childhood, before their local parson and mentor, Abraham Adams, recommended that they postpone marriage until they have the means to live comfortably. On his way to see Fanny, Joseph is mugged and laid up in a nearby inn where, by dint of circumstance, he is reconciled with Adams, who is on his way to London to sell three volumes of his sermons. The thief, too, is found and brought to the inn (only to escape later that night), and Joseph is reunited with his possessions. Adams and Joseph catch up with each other, and the parson, in spite of his own poverty, offers his last 9s 3? d to Joseph’s disposal. Joseph and Adams’ stay in the inn is capped by one of the many burlesque, slapstick digressions in the novel. Betty, the inn’s 21-year-oldchambermaid, had taken a liking to Joseph since he arrived; a liking doomed to inevitable disappointment by Joseph’s constancy to Fanny. The landlord, Mr Tow-wouse, had always admired Betty and saw this disappointment as an opportunity to take advantage. Locked in an embrace, they are discovered by the choleric Mrs Tow-wouse, who chases the maid through the house before Adams is forced to restrain her. With the landlord promising not to transgress again, his lady allows him to make his peace at the cost of ‘quietly and contentedly bearing to be reminded of his transgressions, as a kind of penance, once or twice a day, during the residue of his life’ (I, xviii). edit]Book II During his stay in the inn, Adams’ hopes for his sermons were mocked in a discussion with a travelling bookseller and another parson. Nevertheless, Adams remains resolved to continue his journey to London until it is revealed that his wife, deciding that he would be more in need of shirts than sermons on his journey, has neglected to pack them. The pair thus decide to return to the parson’s parish: Joseph in search of Fan ny, and Adams in search of his sermons. With Joseph following on horseback, Adams finds himself sharing a stagecoach with an anonymous lady and Madam Slipslop, an admirer of Joseph’s and a servant of Lady Booby. When they pass the house of a teenage girl named Leonora, the anonymous lady is reminded of a story and begins one of the novel’s three interpolated tales, ‘The History of Leonora, or the Unfortunate Jilt’. The story of Leonora continues for a number of chapters, punctuated by the questions and interruptions of the other passengers. After stopping at an inn, Adams relinquishes his seat to Joseph and, forgetting his horse, embarks ahead on foot. Finding himself some time ahead of his friend, Adams rests by the side of the road where he becomes so engaged in conversation with a fellow traveller that he misses the stagecoach as it passes. As the night falls and Adams and the stranger discourse on courage and duty, a shriek is heard. The stranger, having seconds earlier lauded the virtues of bravery and chivalry, makes his excuses and flees the scene without turning back. Adams, however, rushes to the girl’s aid and after a mock-epic struggle knocks her attacker unconscious. In spite of Adams’ good intentions, he and the girl, who reveals herself to be none other than Fanny Goodwill (in search of Joseph after hearing of his mugging), find themselves accused of assault and robbery. After some comic litigious wrangling before the local magistrate, the pair are eventually released and depart shortly after midnight in search of Joseph. They do not have to walk far before a storm forces them into the same inn that Joseph and Slipslop have chosen for the night. Slipslop, her jealousy ignited by seeing the two lovers reunited, departs angrily. When Adams, Joseph and Fanny come to leave the following morning, they find their departure delayed by an inability to settle the bill, and, with Adams’ solicitations of a loan from the local parson and his wealthy parishioners failing, it falls on a local peddler to rescue the trio by loaning them his last 6s 6d. The solicitations of charity that Adams is forced to make, and the complications which surround their stay in the parish, bring him into contact with many local squires, gentlemen and parsons, and much of the latter portion of Book II is occupied with the discussions of literature, religion, philosophy and trade which result. edit]Book III The three depart the inn by night, and it is not long before Fanny needs to rest. With the party silent, they overhear approaching voices agree on ‘the murder of any one they meet’ (III, ii) and flee to a local house. Inviting them in, the owner, Mr Wilson, informs them that the gang of supposed murderers were in fact sheep-stealers, intent more on the killing of livestock than of Adams and his friends. The party being settled, Wilson begins the novel’s most lengthy interpolated tale by recounting his life story; a story which bears a notable resemblance to Fielding’s own young adulthood. Wilson begins his tale in the first edition of 1742. At the age of 16, Wilson’s father died and left him a modest fortune. Finding himself the master of his own destiny, he left school and travelled to London where he soon acquainted himself with the dress, manners and reputation for womanising necessary to consider himself a ‘beau’. Wilson’s life in the town is a facade: he writes love-letters to himself, obtains his fine clothes on credit and is concerned more with being seen at the theatre than with watching the play. After two bad experiences with women, he is financially crippled and, much like Fielding himself, falls into the company of a group of Deists,freethinkers and gamblers. Finding himself in debt, he turns to the writing of plays and hack journalism to alleviate his financial burden (again, much like the author himself). He spends his last few pence on alottery ticket but, with no reliable income, is soon forced to exchange it for food. While in jail for his debts, news reaches him that the ticket he gave away has won a ? 3,000 prize. His disappointment is short-lived, however, as the daughter of the winner hears of his plight, pays off his debts, and, after a brief courtship, agrees to become his wife. Wilson had found himself at the mercy of many of the social ills that Fielding had written about in his journalism: the over-saturated and abused literary market, the exploitative state lottery, and regressive laws which sanctioned imprisonment for small debts. Having seen the corrupting influence of wealth and the town, he retires with his new wife to the rural solitude in which Adams, Fanny and Joseph now find them. The only break in his contentment, and one which will turn out to be significant to the plot, was thekidnapping of his eldest son, whom he has not seen since. Wilson promises to visit Adams when he passes through his parish, and after another mock-epic battle on the road, this time with a party of hunting dogs, the trio proceed to the house of a local squire, where Fielding illustrates another contemporary social ill by having Adams subjected to a humiliating roasting. Enraged, the three depart to the nearest inn to find that, while at the squire’s house, they had been robbed of their last half-guinea. To compound their misery, the squire has Adams and Joseph accused of kidnapping Fanny, in order to have them detained while he orders the abduction of the girl himself. She is rescued in transit, however, by Lady Booby’s steward, Peter Pounce, and all four of them complete the remainder of the journey to Booby Hall together. [edit]Book IV On seeing Joseph arrive back in the parish, a jealous Lady Booby meanders through emotions as diverse as rage, pity, hatred, pride and love. The next morning Joseph and Fanny’s banns are published and the Lady turns her anger onto Parson Adams, who is accommodating Fanny at his house. Finding herself powerless either to stop the marriage or to expel them from the parish, she enlists the help of Lawyer Scout, who brings a spurious charge of larceny against Joseph and Fanny in order to prevent, or at least postpone, the wedding. Three days later, the Lady’s plans are foiled by the visit of her nephew, Mr Booby, and a surprise guest: Booby has married Pamela, granting Joseph a powerful new ally and brother-in-law. What is more, Booby is an acquaintance of the justice presiding over Joseph and Fanny’s trial, and instead of Bridewell, has them committed to his own custody. Knowing of his sister’s antipathy to the two lovers, Booby offers to reunite Joseph with his sister and take him and Fanny into his own parish and his own family. In a discourse with Joseph on stoicism and fatalism, Adams instructs his friend to submit to the will of God and control his passions, even in the face of overwhelming tragedy. In the kind of cruel juxtaposition usually reserved for Fielding’s less savoury characters, Adams is informed that his youngest son, Jacky, has drowned. After indulging his grief in a manner contrary to his lecture a few minutes previously, Adams is informed that the report was premature, and that his son had in fact been rescued by the same pedlar that loaned him his last few shillings in Book II. Lady Booby, in a last-ditch attempt to sabotage the marriage, brings a young beau named Didapper to Adams’ house to seduce Fanny. Fanny is unattracted to his bold attempts of courtship. Didapper is a little too bold in his approach and provokes Joseph into a fight. The Lady and the beau depart in disgust, but the pedlar, having seen the Lady, is compelled to relate a tale. The pedlar had met his wife while in the army, and she died young. While on her death bed, she confessed that she once stole an exquisitely beautiful baby girl from a family named Andrews, and sold her on to Sir Thomas Booby, thus raising the possibility that Fanny may in fact be Joseph’s sister. The company is shocked, but there is general relief that the crime of incest may have been narrowly averted. The following morning, Joseph and Pamela’s parents arrive, and, together with the pedlar and Adams, they piece together the question of Fanny’s parentage. The Andrews identify her as their lost daughter, but have a twist to add to the tale: when Fanny was an infant, she was indeed stolen from her parents, but the thieves left behind a sickly infant Joseph in return, who was raised as their own. It is immediately apparent that Joseph is the abovementioned kidnapped son of Wilson, and when Wilson arrives on his promised visit, he identifies Joseph by a birthmark on his chest. Joseph is now the son of a respected gentleman, Fanny an in-law of the Booby family, and the couple no longer suspected of being siblings. Two days later they are married by Adams in a humble ceremony, and the narrator, after bringing the story to a close, and in a disparaging allusion to Richardson, assures the reader that there will be no sequel. [edit]Stage Adaptation Joseph Andrews, a stage adaptation of the first and fourth books of the novel, was written by Samuel Jackson Pratt and performed on 20 April 1778 at the Theatre Royal, Drury Lane. The role of Fanny was played by Mary Robinson. [1] [edit]Film adaptation The novel was adapted for the screen in 1977 by Tony Richardson, Allan Scott and Chris Bryant. Richardson directed the critically well-received work, with Michael Hordern as Adams, Peter Firth as Joseph, and Lady Booby played by Swedish-born Ann-Margret, who received aGolden Globe nomination for the role. The tag line (‘The story of a young, English footman who served the Lady Booby but loved the little Fanny’) suggests how it captures some of the source material’s bawdy humour. It was released on region 1 DVD in 2003. [edit]References 1. ^ Oxford Journals, November 1967 ?A contemporary New York Times review of the 1977 film adaptation Requires free subscription ? Cleary, Thomas R. (26 June 2002). Henry Fielding: The History of the Adventures of Joseph Andrews and of his Friend Mr. Abraham Adams. The Literary Encyclopedia. Retrieved 25 April 2011. ? Adams, Parson Abraham. New International Encyclopedia. 1905. [edit]External links Full text of Joseph Andrews from Project Gutenberg ?Joseph Andrews, Volume 1 ?Joseph Andrews, Volume 2 hide]v †¢ d †¢ eHenry Fielding PeopleJohn Fielding †¢ Sarah Fielding †¢ Christopher Smart †¢ Samuel Richardson †¢ Scriblerus Club EventsActor Rebellion of 1733 †¢ Licensing Act 1737 †¢ Paper War of 1752–1753 Early plays Love in Several Masques †¢ The Temple Beau †¢ The Authors Farce †¢ Tom Thumb †¢ Rape upon Rape †¢The Tragedy of Tragedies †¢ The Letter Wr iters †¢ The Welsh Opera †¢ The Grub Street Opera †¢ The Lottery †¢The Modern Husband †¢ The Old Debauchees †¢ The Covent Garden Tragedy †¢ The Mock Doctor Later playsThe Historical Register for the Year 1736 Novels and NarrativesShamela †¢ Joseph Andrews †¢ Jonathan Wild †¢ Tom Jones †¢ Amelia Essays and Misc. The Covent-Garden Journal View page ratings Rate this page Whats this? Trustworthy Objective Complete Well-written I am highly knowledgeable about this topic (optional) Submit ratings Categories: 1742 novels | Novels by Henry Fielding | Comedy novels | Metafictional works | Works inspired by Don Quixote | English novels| Picaresque novels †¢Log in / create account †¢Article †¢Discussion †¢Read †¢Edit †¢View history †¢Main page †¢Contents †¢Featured content †¢Current events Random article †¢Donate to Wikipedia Interaction †¢Help †¢About Wikipedia †¢Community portal †¢Recent changes †¢Contact Wikipedia Toolbox Print/export Languages †¢Espanol †¢Francais †¢Italiano †¢ †¢Polski †¢Svenska †¢This page was last modified on 29 July 2011 at 18:08. †¢Tex t is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of use for details. Wikipedia ® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. , a non-profit organization. †¢Contact us †¢Privacy policy †¢About Wikipedia †¢Disclaimers †¢Mobile view

How To React To Suffering Religion Essays

How To React To Suffering Religion Essays How To React To Suffering Religion Essay How To React To Suffering Religion Essay Essay Topic: The Haunting Of Hill House Hello and welcome to Word Alive, produced by Good News Broadcasting. I m Brenda Critchley, and it s my joy to present you to a survey of God s Word and happen out what His programs and His promises are for us. And today Dr. Derek Stringer is back with us to go on the series of surveies he s been making on The How To Of Christianity. And can you believe of any thing more relevant to us than today s capable How To React To Suffering. I ll be back from clip to clip but over to you Derek. Darmstadtium Brenda, thank you. Elie Weisel was a subsister of a Nazi concentration cantonment as a kid and Nobel Laureate. His eyes deep set and haunting, were adequate to state you he had seen horrors and experienced injuries that defied human articulation. They could merely be known by being felt, and you felt them by looking in his eyes. He asked a pupil one twenty-four hours when he was holding an single meeting with him: How make you get by with God? Why life? Why decease? Why agony? For him, it was nt a inquiry of whether God existed. It was the really fact that God did be, and at the same clip had allowed the World War Two atrociousnesss to happen, that made him anguish. The pupil did nt cognize what to state. Every word he could believe of sounded trite and onionskin because he knew he did nt hold that same expression to his eyes. This experience began to force him to the threshold of his ain apprehension of hurting and to gain that human agony is utmost, non merely because we suffer but because merely the human being expressions for significance in the agony. Animals do nt. It s the yearning for significance in the thick of inexplicable, mindless hurting that makes us inquire why? What s the intent? Why does God let it? And that, in some ways unanswerable inquiry, increases the agony we experience. Is there such a thing as Christian agony? GNB Many Christians think those two words, Christian and agony should nt be joined. Darmstadtium For many people, the label Christian enduring sounds out-of-place. They insist a Christian should neer hold to digest hurting and agony. But the Bible speaks obviously about the world of enduring in the life of a Christian. GNB Peter was composing to Christians who were enduring awful persecution. Darmstadtium Yes, while Nero was Emperor in Rome, there was a great fire which destroyed two-thirds of the metropolis. Historians suggest Lucius domitius ahenobarbus allowed the fire and so fiddled about while the metropolis burned. Regardless of how it started, Nero blamed Christians for the fire. As a consequence, the persecution against trusters was intense during this clip. He wrote his missive to promote enduring Saints. Peter addressed the subject of enduring 15 times in merely five chapters. Today, we are traveling to analyze the subject of enduring as we study the message found in 1 Peter 1:6 to 9. GNB The Bible says: In this you greatly rejoice, though now for a small while you may hold had to endure heartache in all sorts of tests. These have come so that your faith-of greater worth than gold, which perishes even though refined by fire-may be proved echt and may ensue in congratulations, glorification and honor when Jesus Christ is revealed. Though you have non seen him, you love him ; and even though you do non see him now, you believe in him and are filled with an unexpressible and glorious joy, for you are having the end of your religion, the redemption of your psyches. Darmstadtium Peter warns us that even though we are followings of Jesus, we will see tests. The word test is another word for problem or trial. A test is a painful experience that, given the pick, we would ever avoid if possible. But since we are traveling to face tests, we should larn every bit much as we can about what tests are and how we should respond to enduring. Let s analyze four of import rules about the tests and trials that we face. First: TRIALS COME IN A VARIETY OF FORMS GNB Peter writes in verse 6: For a small while you may hold had to endure heartache in all sorts of tests. Darmstadtium It s of import to understand that a test is non the same thing as a enticement. In the first chapter of James epistle he writes about both tests and enticements. He makes a differentiation between them. Here are some differences: A enticement is devised by Satan to do you sin ; a test is allowed by God to allow you reflect ; a enticement is designed to drive you off from God ; but a test is designed to pull you closer to God ; a enticement will weaken you ; a test will beef up you. A enticement is neer intolerable ( the Bible says you ll neer be tempted beyond what you are able ) ; whereas a test is frequently beyond our ability to digest on our ain. A enticement must be resisted, but a test must be embraced but unhappily we frequently resist God s tests and embracing enticements! GNB Peter writes we will endure all sorts of tests. Darmstadtium That s a phrase that means varicolored colors. It s like a stained glass window comprised of 100s of different colored pieces of glass. An stray test is like one piece of glass-it may be confounding. But when you take all the tests you ll confront together, you can see God is making something beautiful and valuable of your life. You may confront a fiscal test when you do nt hold adequate money or sometimes a harder test is when you have more money than you truly necessitate to populate! What you do with it is a test. You may confront a physical test, when the physician tells you that you have some sort of unwellness and your life is instantly changed. Some of you are confronting matrimony tests, or vocational trials-as many coloring material fluctuations as you can happen in the universe-that s the sort of assortment you may anticipate in tests and trials. GNB Cipher is immune to problem. Darmstadtium No There was a adult male in the Old Testament who knew a small about enduring ; his name was Job. Satan accused Job of being spoiled rotten. He was a Devout adult male because he had so many approvals. Satan contended before God that if Job lost his approvals he would besides lose his religion. So God allowed tests and trials to come into Job s life. In a short period of clip Job lost his wealth, his household, and his wellness. In the center of all of his hardship, GNB And Job made this observation: Man is born to problem every bit certainly as flickers fly upward. Darmstadtium It is the nature of fire to throw flickers upward. And as Job observed, it is portion of our nature to see hurting and agony. We know Job s agony was a test-and he passed the trial. His married woman and friends told him to cuss God and dice. GNB Alternatively Job came to a topographic point where he said, I know that my Jesus lives! And I shall see Him someday! Darmstadtium When you re being tested it s of import to retrieve God put a bound to what Satan could make in proving Job. In the same manner, our tests may come from Satan, but they are filtered by God. When you make java you may set a paper filter in the java shaper. You do nt desire to hold the java evidences in your cup. It s good to cognize that all of your tests have to go through through the filter of God s grace, and the filter of His clemency, and the filter of His omnipotence. What painful experience are you confronting right now? Would it do a difference if you knew it was a trial? How would you react if you were traveling through the same trial Job faced? I saw a amusing sketch late. A little kid was standing at her instructor s desk and the caption read, I do nt desire to frighten you, but my dada says if I do nt acquire better classs SOMEBODY is traveling to be in problem! For a Christian, agony is like that Emergency Broadcasting System proclamation you hear on the telecasting and wireless when you re in the USA. They break in and state, This is a trial, this is merely a trial. When you face tests and trials, merely state to yourself: THIS IS A TEST-THIS IS ONLY A Trial! SECONDLY. TRIALS REVEAL THE PURITY OF YOUR FAITH. GNB Peter writes in verse 7: These have come so that your faith-of greater worth than gold, which perishes even though refined by fire-may be proved echt. Darmstadtium Gold is a absorbing trade good ; it has been valuable for centuries. I like the amusing narrative of the adult male who made a trade with God. He said, God, I know you say that I ca nt take it with me when I go to heaven, but, please, will you allow me take merely one bag with me to heaven? The Lord said, Certain. So, before the adult male died, he cashed in all his investings and bought pure gold bars to take to heaven he wanted to be the richest adult male in Eden. The twenty-four hours came when he died, as all must make, and he arrived at the Pearly Gates toting his bag. The angels on responsibility said, It s unusual for person to convey a bag into Eden, but we understand you made a trade with the Boss. But we ll hold to look into the contents of your bag. The adult male handed it over, and one of the angels opened it. The other angel said, What is it? The first angel scratched his caput and said, You wo nt believe it, but he merely brought a bag full of paving. Gold is rare and valuable on Earth, but John writes that in Eden, there are streets of gold! The ground gold is valuable on Earth is because it is rare. Peter writes that there is something we possess that is of greater value than gold-our religion. Like gold, our religion is refined by the fire of agony. Gold is frequently embedded in stone, and must be refined. It is placed in a crucible and heated to a high temperature. As the gold thaws, it can be extracted from the other elements. Even today, there are different degrees of pureness of gold used in jewelry. Gold can be combined with other metals to organize an metal that is nt pure gold. 14 carat gold is non pure, like 24 carats gold. To bring forth pure gold, the metal has to be refined by fire. Some costume jewelry is made of steel covered with gilded pigment. Costume jewelry for illustration. A ring looks great-but the metal is merely painted gold and the diamond is really three-dimensional Zr! Over the old ages, the gold pigment wears off until the existent nature of the metal is revealed. If this ring was put into a refiner s fire, it would be proved an imitation. God frequently refines our religion for two grounds: One: To turn out our religion is echt ; and Two: To sublimate our religion. It is merely in the fire of enduring that you discover whether your religion is echt, or if it s a inexpensive imitation. When it is summertime and the life in easy, and the fish are leaping, and the cotton is high, it s easy to state you have faith. But it is during the tough times your religion is proved. GNB The Bible compares our religion to gold and Ag, and God is the refiner. Darmstadtium He sometimes turns up the heat so our religion can be purified. Like gold or Ag, our religion frequently contains drosss. It is through the fire of enduring our religion is simplified and purified. GNB In Isaiah 48:10 we read: God says, See I have refined you, though non as Ag ; I have tested you in the furnace of affliction. Darmstadtium Is your religion the existent thing-in the furnace of affliction, your religion is tested and proved. Cipher likes to travel through fire of affliction, but if your religion is existent, it merely makes your religion more valuable. I read the words of a university lector. He shared his narrative. He started holding pharynx jobs and the trials revealed he had malignant neoplastic disease in his lymph secretory organs and pharynx. That s a chilling diagnosing for anyone. After surgery he started a procedure of having 42 radiation interventions. It was a atrocious, painful procedure. He was strapped down to a metal tabular array for 30 proceedingss while the radiation was directed to different parts of his pharynx. He was literally traveling through the fire because the radiation was firing off the affected tissue. It was non a pleasant experience. He lost 40 lbs, and his hair came out in bunchs. His pharynx hurt so severely he could nt get down H2O without taking hurting medicine. But he said at that clip, he was faced with a this inquiry, Is what I say I believe about God existent or is it merely something that sounds good when everything is traveling good? He said it was religious intestine cheque. When he was at the lowest point, he truly considered that he might decease, yet when he looked decease in the oculus, he discovered he was nt afraid to decease. During his interventions, the vocal that meant the most to him was I Can Merely Imagine by Mercy Me. He would hold it played during his interventions, and he came to understand his worst instance scenario was run intoing Jesus face to face-and that was nt a chilling thing. His last two cheque ups have revealed no reoccurrence of the malignant neoplastic disease, and as he looks back on that experience he would nt wish it on anyone. Yet, he said that he made a valuable find: His religion is existent, like pure gold. In add-on, he discovered his religion was purified, and became stronger through that ordeal. Are you confronting a hot furnace of affliction right now? God is nt the writer of agony, but He can utilize it. Cancer, illness and disease are the effects of life in a fallen, corrupted universe. But when you find yourself in the fire of affliction, retrieve God is proving you. Your religion may still hold some drosss so God may turn up the heat to acquire rid of those drosss. So if you re enduring right now, retrieve that although the fire is non pleasant, it is turn outing and sublimating your religion. Do nt worry-you wo nt be consumed by the fire-God loves you and He is still in control. GNB Remember: God may non light the fire of affliction, but He controls the thermoregulator! Darmstadtium You may inquire when He s traveling to turn down the heat. It s when the refinement procedure is finished. A silversmith looks into the crucible and tickers as the purified Ag floats to the top. The manner he knows the Ag is purified is when he can see a perfect contemplation of his face in the molten Ag. As the refiner, God is looking at you, and when He sees the contemplation of the character of Jesus in your life, that episode of refinement is normally completed. GNB You are listening to Word Alive with Derek Stringer and I m Brenda Critchley. Today s message is How To React To Suffering and it s portion of the current series by Derek The How To Of Christianity. You do nt necessitate to lose out on the whole series because we re entering each of these messages. It will do a good gift every bit good. I ll give you our contact inside informations at the terminal of the programme. Let s acquire back to our bible survey with Dr Stringer. Darmstadtium And Let s expression at a Third thing about trails: THEY FORCE YOU TO FOCUS ON JESUS. Tests are hard, and the lone manner to digest them is to look to Jesus, the writer and closer of our religion. Peter makes it clear that we ca nt see Him with our eyes of flesh, but we still believe in Him. He wrote in poetries seven and eight: when Jesus Christ is revealed. Though you have non seen him, you love him ; and even though you do non see him now, you believe in him. It would be easy to believe if you could see Jesus in the flesh standing in forepart of you when you were enduring. But Peter is stating us that we must develop eyes of religion. God has a manner of acquiring our attending when we re enduring. After coming through a clip of caring for his married woman as she died of malignant neoplastic disease, C. S. Lewis wrote these words: GNB God susurrations to us in our pleasances but He shouts to us in our hurting. Agony is God s megaphone to wake up a dormant universe. Darmstadtium That s why we need to encompass the tests we experience instead than running from them. On the first Easter Sunday eventide, Jesus appeared to the adherents in the upper room. Thomas was nt at that place. Later, the adherents told Thomas Jesus was alive, and he did nt believe them. He said, Unless I can see Him with my eyes and set my fingers in the nail prints and lesion in His side I wo nt believe! That s why we call him doubting Thomas. A hebdomad subsequently Jesus appeared once more and Thomas was present. Jesus approached Thomas and said, Here I am. Go in front, set your fingers in my nail prints, and set your manus in this lesion in my side. Thomas merely said, My Lord, and my Supreme being! Then Jesus made a profound statement about Thomas and about us. He said, Because you have seen me you believed? Blessed are those who have non seen me and yet believed! That s what Peter is writing-we have nt seen Jesus with our eyes of flesh, yet we look at him with our eyes of religion. There s a great narrative in the Old Testament about maintaining your eyes on God, even when you ca nt see Him. In 2 Histories 20, Jehoshaphat is king of Judah, and they were surrounded by a immense ground forces. GNB The Bible says Jehoshaphat was scared, yet he prayed a powerful supplication of religion found in 2 Histories 20: King Jehoshaphat prayed: O, God, we have no power to confront this huge ground forces that is assailing us. We do non cognize what to make, but our eyes are upon You. Darmstadtium Then Jehoshaphat devised an unusual conflict program. He put the choir on the front line and they marched into conflict singing vocals of congratulations to God. And the Bible says the LORD set ambuscades against their enemies and they started contending among themselves until they killed each other. What a powerful lesson! When you face an enemy that is overpowering, do nt concentrate on the enemy, set your eyes on God. Then approach that hard state of affairs with congratulations on your lips, and you will ever see triumph. When you are enduring, do nt concentrate on your job or on your hurting, focal point on God, and when you focus on God, you ll desire to praise Him. GNB Old ages ago there was a popular congratulations vocal. It goes, It s astonishing what praising will make. Hallelujah. Hallelujah! It s astonishing what praising will make! Hallelujah! I do nt worry when things go incorrect. Jesus fills my bosom with a vocal. It s astonishing what praising will make. Hallelujah! Darmstadtium Remember, this is the large fisherman, Peter, composing this missive. He knew what it was to maintain his eyes on Jesus, and he knew what happened when you took your eyes off Jesus. One dark Jesus came walking on the H2O to fall in the adherents. Peter asked Jesus if he could walk on the H2O, and Jesus said, Come on! Peter stepped out on religion and started walking on the H2O. He was nt truly walking on H2O ; he was walking on the Word of Jesus. But the Bible says Peter took his eyes off Jesus and started looking at the air current and the moving ridges. When he did, he began to drop. When you look at your troubles and jobs, you are in problem. But if you focus on Jesus, you can walk to triumph! Here s a 4th point: Test CAN PRODUCE INEXPRESSIBLE JOY. GNB In poetry six Peter writes, In this you greatly rejoice, and once more in poetries eight and nine: You are filled with an unexpressible and glorious joy, for you are having the end of your religion, the redemption of your psyches. Darmstadtium He repeats that warning that we should joy when we face tests and agony. Remember, joying is non a feeling-it s a pick! That s one of the things that makes us different from those who do nt cognize Jesus: We should show joy, even when we are enduring. When you are traveling through the furnace of affliction, you are forced to depend on God. One ground God allows you to endure is so you will catch clasp of His power with both custodies. GNB There s a beautiful vocal entitled Treasures that says: One by one He took them from me, All the things I valued most Until I was empty handed, Every glittering plaything was lost. And I walked Earth s main road grieving In my shreds and poorness Till I heard His voice inviting, Raise your empty custodies to Me. So I held my custodies toward Heaven, And He filled them with a shop Of His ain transcendent wealths Till they could incorporate no more. And at that I comprehended, With my stupid head and dull That God could non pour His wealths Into custodies already full. Darmstadtium It may be that you re enduring right now because God is seeking to learn you that He is all you need. The promise of God is that we will endure, but it s merely for a small piece. Even if you suffer for 80 old ages, that s merely a blip on the timeline of infinity. There are plentifulness of experiences that cause us hurting, and our eyes frequently fill up with cryings, but God promises in infinity He will pass over all the cryings from our eyes. GNB He gives us a great promise in Psalm 30:5: Weeping may stay for a dark, but joying comes in the forenoon. Darmstadtium You may be enduring in the dark dark of depression and disheartenment, but you can cognize that the forenoon is coming. That forenoon is coming, but we do nt hold to wait until the forenoon to joy. We can joy NOW! GNB Derek will be back in merely a minute to round off today s Word Alive all about How To React To Suffering. Cadmium s and transcripts are available for this and other messages. We send the Cadmium s merely for the managing charge, transcripts are free to an electronic mail reference. Simply name us on our FREE PHONE figure for the UK leave a message if you are naming outside office hours 08,000 92 78 92. Here once more is Derek Stringer. Darmstadtium Let me give you an acrostic for SUFFER: S.U.F.F.E.R. Measure Up For Faith s Eternal Reward. When you suffer, understand that it s a trial, this is merely a trial. Understand that your religion is more valuable than gold and you are traveling through a refinement procedure. Focus your eyes on Jesus, even though you do nt see Him, trust Him. And so you ll be able to joy. The greatest contradiction in this universe is a joyless Christian. Once when Martin Luther was traveling through a period of depression, his married woman, Katie came into his survey have oning all black, with her face covered with a black head covering. Martin Luther asked her, Who died? She said, God died. Luther responded, Silly adult female, God has nt died. She said, Oh, I thought by the manner you were moving that God had died. She wanted to remind him that Jesus is alive and God is in control. It worked, and Martin Luther left his bad temper and began to joy once more. Let me inquire you, Has God died? Is Jesus alive? Then allow s demo the universe we can joy, even when we are enduring. I know I have nt answered all the inquiries you have about enduring. There are many more inquiries we could inquire, and many ca nt be answered in this life. When I visited Auschvitch I saw excessively many exposures of work forces, adult females and kids gazing back at me. I besides know that in worst desperation, in the hazards of concentration cantonments, and prisons, and labour cantonments, in the deepnesss of mental convulsion, and the throws of serious unwellness, people have found Jesus there God s presence is alive even in the darkest snake pit. I ran across a small supplication that allied military personnels emancipating the Ravensbruck concentration cantonment found written on a piece of wrapping paper. It had been composed by a captive, who died there before deliverance came. It read: O Lord, Jesus, Remember non merely the work forces and adult females of good will, But besides those of ailment will. But do non merely retrieve the agony they have inflicted on us, Remember the fruits we bore thanks to this agony, Our chumminess, our trueness, our humbleness, The bravery, the generousness, The illustriousness of bosom which has grown out of all this. And when they come to opinion, Let all the fruits that we have borne Be their forgiveness. Amons, Amen, Amen. GNB Such proof such unconquerable cogent evidence is nt it that there is no deepness of hurting to which we can travel where God s love is non deeper still. Darmstadtium It genuinely is You do nt hold to allow immoralities hold the last word in your life. You can, by the grace of Jesus Christ and the power of the Holy Spirit choose to love once more. GNB Here are the contact inside informations that you ll necessitate to acquire in touch with us The FREE PHONE figure for the UK is 08,000 92 78 92. For your electronic mail use our web site www.gnba.net That s gnba.net Word Alive is a Good News Broadcasting Association production with Dr Derek Stringer our Bible Teacher and I m Brenda thanks to Phil Critchley our Producer. I hope that you ll be able to fall in us once more following clip as we continue this series The How To Of Christianity. Good pass and God bless you.

Scout Quotes From To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee

Scout Quotes From 'To Kill a Mockingbird' by Harper Lee The young Scout Finch,  from To Kill a Mockingbird, by Harper Lee, is one of American literatures  most iconic and unforgettable fictional characters. The book deals with issues of racial injustice and gender roles in the American South. The book was largely based on Lees own childhood, growing up in Monroeville, Alabama, during the Great Depression. Published at the start of the civil rights movement, the book called for tolerance  and condemned the treatment of African-Americans in the South. Through its tomboy narrator, the author discusses the frustrations of living within strict female gender roles.   On Being a Girl â€Å"[Calpurnia] seemed glad to see me when I appeared in the kitchen, and by watching her I began to think there was some skill involved in being a girl.† â€Å"[Aunt Alexandra said that] I was born good but had grown progressively worse every year.† â€Å"I was not so sure, but Jem told me I was being a girl, that girls always imagined things, that’s why other people hated them so, and if I started behaving like one I could just go off and find some to play with.† â€Å"I felt the starched walls of a pink cotton penitentiary closing in on me, and for the second time in my life, I thought of running away. Immediately.† On Boo Radley Then I saw the shadow. It was the shadow of a man with a hat on. At first, I thought it was a tree, but there was no wind blowing, and tree trunks never walked. The back porch was bathed in moonlight, and the shadow, crisp, and toast moved across the porch towards Jem. (They think the shadow is Boo Radley, whom theyve been taught to fear.) On Jem The sixth grade seemed to please him from the beginning: he went through a brief Egyptian Period that baffled me- he tried to walk flat a great deal, sticking one arm in front of him and one in back of him, putting one foot behind the other. He declared Egyptians walked that way; I said if they did I didnt see how they got anything done, but Jem said they accomplished more than the Americans ever did, they invented toilet paper and perpetual embalming, and asked where would we be today if they hadnt? Atticus told me to delete the adjectives and Id have the facts. To Jack â€Å"Pass the damn ham, please.† (said during Scouts attempt to try and get out of going to school) On Fighting â€Å"Atticus had promised me he would wear me out if he ever heard of me fighting anymore; I was far too old and too big for such childish things, and the sooner I learned to hold in, the better off everybody would be.† â€Å"After my bout with Cecil Jacobs when I committed myself to a policy of cowardice, word got around that Scout Finch wouldn’t fight anymore, her daddy wouldn’t let her. This was not entirely correct: I wouldn’t fight publicly for Atticus, but the family was private ground. I would fight anyone from a third cousin upwards tooth and nail. Francis Hancock, for example, knew that.† ​ On White Lies â€Å"I said I would like it very much, which was a lie, but one must lie under certain circumstances and at all times when one can’t do anything about them.† (on Aunt Alexandra moving in) On Dill â€Å"With him, life was routine; without him, life was unbearable.† On People I think theres just one kind of folks. Folks.

Occupy Wall Street Movement Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words

Occupy Wall Street Movement - Essay Example The moral and economic implications of Occupy Wall Street movement are quite diverse in nature. The major facets of the movement are social and economic disparity, greediness, corruption and unwarranted power of business organizations on government. The moral issues of Occupy Wall Street movement comprise equality, care and freedom (Kaneck, 2012). The common concern recognized in the movement is the wealth gap between 1% (who are categorized as wealthy businessmen and bankers) and the 99% (who are the other citizens including the protestors). According to the protestors, the 1% has excessive wealth and authority and also has power over economic well-being of the nation. The protestors of Occupy Wall Street movement view the rich as frauds who misuse the economic systems and policies (Jickling & Hoskins, 2011). Thoroughly Analyze Each of the Implications Identified Above Against the Utilitarian, Kantian, and Virtue Ethics to Determine Which Theory Best Applies To the Movement; Thoroug hly Supported Your Position with Examples and Evidence Ethical theories have been considered for analyzing the protest movement. The above implications of Occupy Wall Street movement can be analyzed by using three major ethical theories which are Utilitarian, Kantian and Virtue Ethics. Utilitarian approach generally depends on the view that ethical activities can generate most of the good outcomes for society and economy. It is a general belief that society is the net outcome of individual choices for conducting certain activities. Utilitarian ethics possess the view that appropriate course of activities can enhance the value of individuals, increase the happiness and minimize the sufferings of people in a society. Kantian ethics is based on the thought of ethical responsibility. It proclaims that an activity can only be considered as ethical if it is conducted on the basis of duty, rather than on the basis consequences of such actions. The outcome of Kantian ethics is subject to th e statement that there is no inherent connection between happiness and virtue. It highlights the right activity over the good activity. On the other hand, virtue ethics concentrates on the role of an individual for defining or assessing ethical behaviors and activities. The differences between these three ethics depend on the way ethical problems are approached (Cobbett & Germain, 2012). With respect to the Occupy Wall Street movement, unseen events of bailout, movement of money and economic crisis are all agreed upon certain activities of people. Considering the above three ethical theories, utilitarian ethics best match with the implications of Occupy Wall Street movement. It can be observed that the objective of Occupy Wall Street movement is to minimize the corruption and enhance the participation of government in order to support the economic growth and to ensure equality of wealth and income. Furthermore, the moral and economic implications with respect to the minimization of unemployment, income inequality and equal wealth distribution can only be possible if utilitarian ethics is followed (Asanuma, 2011). Thoroughly Determine Who Is Responsible For Income Inequality And Wealth Distribution In The U.S. In Your Analysis, Make Sure To Include If This Is Something That Happened Suddenly or If It Built Up

BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE Literature review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3000 words

BEHAVIOURAL FINANCE - Literature review Example Thus, there is a need for a new economic paradigm that can enhance the economic condition of all countries. The literature lays stress upon different views of the scholars and researchers related to the current topic. It is observed that few of these scholars are in favour of the idea, whereas others have directly opposed the same. Presently, there is a great need for change as individuals perceive that economic, social and environmental shifts are necessary. The global population is increasing at an alarming rate accompanied by an extraordinary improvement in life expectancy worldwide. Innovations made in the technological industry have enabled the people to learn and communicate essential information on a global level. The inequality between poor and rich countries has continued to grow with the passage of time. The demand for natural resources has increased and climate changes are more frequent than ever. The main issue related to the world economy is the most severe one. Apart from the abovementioned difficulties, the economic paradigm is also questioned as the world economy is heading towards a decline (Reza, 1999). The economic condition worsened as the blame game persisted so as to identify the one responsible for the economic downturn and recession. Primarily, the blame was put on the financial managers who had failed to identify and manage risk appropriately and even the regulators did not stop them from undertaking any fraudulent activity. The economic strategy devised for promoting growth was inadequate. Businesses and governments had stated the need for a new economic paradigm, which can facilitate sustenance of the environment. New Economics Movement had rapidly grown over the past few years. New Economics Foundation and The Other Economic Summit formed a part of the movement. It had clearly identified that the present economic model is

This Boys Life Essay -- Literature Life Decisions Relationships Essay

Dwight and Caroline’s relationship can be characterized into three stages. From its inception Jack and Caroline had a relationship based on infatuation alone. Their relationship consisted of passion alone for each other. Caroline was sexually attracted to Dwight, as was he to her. Caroline was infatuated with the person Dwight appeared to be. She was turned on that he was nice and charming and knew how to treat a woman. When they first began to go out Caroline adored the fact that he brought her flowers. Dwight was simply interested in Caroline for what she had to offer him. The passion alone is what got him to that level. Soon after their relationship developed into a Fatuous Love. In the beginning of the marriage the couple’s relationship had been based on passion and commitment. Both were still physically and sexually attracted to each other but the role of commitment came into play as well. Dwight needed a female figure in the home to do his chores, such as cook hi s dinner and clean his house, as well as a mother-like figure for his children. Caroline needed to settle down and start her life over. She was tired of always being on the run, and Dwight brought as sense of security and stability into her life. She also needed a father for Jack. This may have driven her into the arms of Jack more than any other reason. Dwight had everything she was looking for in a father for Jack. He seemed caring, authoritarian, loving, and stable. Their relationship would continue to go on in this manner until the passion faded. This led to an Empty Love relationship. The commitment alone is what kept them together. They no longer had any real feelings of love fore one another. Dwight was simply with Caroline for the reason that she kept food on the table and kept his house clean. Caroline on the other hand was still with Dwight because she had no where else to turn as well as what Jack had to offer her son. Dwight was like a father figure to Jack, something th at Jack never had before and needed at this age because he was very impressionable. Caroline’s commitment, for the fact that he provided for them and supposedly was like a father to Jack kept her with Dwight. From the time Jack arrived in Seattle to the time he left for prep school Jack’s behaviors and life decisions were extrinsically and intrinsically motivated. Upon his arrival in Seattle with his mother Jac... ...e his life in Concrete would be wasted if he didn’t realize that this is his opportunity to leave. I would also tell Arthur that he can â€Å"succeed† and make it big because he’s a smart kid, and that he shouldn’t let his mind and talent go to waste, especially not in a crude town like Concrete. In a way I seized my chance when I made my decision to move to Danbury. Things weren’t going to well for me back in NY. I was hanging out with too many people from the wrong crowd, and that eventually put me in many uncomfortable situations. I was lagging behind in school and I kept getting into trouble. Had I stayed in NY I probably would be up to the same things now as I was before. I would be cutting school and causing my mother even more grief. Since I moved here I have brought up my grades and am preparing for the SAT’s. That is another thing I doubt I would be doing if I were in NY. Eleventh grade is the most important grade, and I knew I needed to do well if I wanted to go to a good college and make something o myself. The opportunity arose when my aunt moved here and I seized the chance. I’m glad I didn’t decide to stay, otherwise I would be wondering if I could have pulled it off.